It was the second time in a year that a U.S. court found that the company had acted illegally to remain dominant.

Judge Brinkema’s ruling found Google “liable under Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act” for its monopolistic behaviors in the ...

Google has been branded an abusive monopolist by a federal judge for the second time in less than a year, this time for ...

Google has illegally built “monopoly power” with its web advertising business, a federal judge in Virginia has ruled, siding ...

It is the second major case Google has lost in a year, after it was found to have a monopoly on online search.

Google's advertising business, which generates key revenue for the tech giant, is an illegal monopoly, a federal judge ruled ...

In another major legal blow to Google, a federal judge on Thursday ruled that the search giant held an illegal monopoly over ...

A U.S. judge's ruling that Google has illegal monopolies in ad technology sets up the possibility of U.S. prosecutors seeking ...

Google illegally acted to preserve “monopoly power” in the digital ad-tech business, a federal judge ruled Thursday. It’s the ...

For over a decade, "Google has willfully engaged in a series of anticompetitive acts to acquire and maintain monopoly power ...

Lawyers for tech giant Meta told a federal judge on Monday that the social media company is not a monopoly as an antitrust ...

The ruling is the latest against Google in the last year finding the company acted illegally to maintain market dominance.