The PowerShot G7 X Mark III faces some strong competition from the likes of Sony and Panasonic, but with a longer-than-usual lens, great handling and a whole suite of niceties for videographers ...

I’m about to break down everything from first impressions, settings, and necessary accessories to the ~technical~ differences between the older G7 X Mark II and the newer G7 X Mark III.

It’s best used in conjunction with the various physical buttons which are found on the body of the G5 X Mark II, which we’ll come to shortly. Front of the Canon PowerShot G5 X Mark II Just like the G7 ...

ISO 6400 shows more obvious noise but still remain perfectly usable, although the fastest native setting of ISO 12800 is best avoided. The Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark III handled chromatic aberrations ...

A smartphone may suffice for some, but if you prefer the ergonomics and the handling of a traditional camera, the Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark III ($749. ... are f/2.8 at best and dim quickly when ...

Angled view of the PowerShot G7 X Mark III. (Source: Canon.) Other features common to the G7 X III and ... Softening was most problematic at wider angles of view, with the best performance occurring ...

A smartphone may suffice for some, but if you prefer the ergonomics and the handling of a traditional camera, the Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark III ($749. ... are f/2.8 at best and dim quickly when ...

(For the record, the newer RX100 Mark III has an aperture range of f/1.8-2.8, but the focal range is only 24-70mm.) The PowerShot G7 X is without a doubt one of the best pocket cameras Canon has ...