The Supreme Court denied a petition to hear a challenge to an appeals court ruling regarding a student who fought for his right to wear a provocative T-shirt to school.

As Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito approach their two-decade milestones on the Supreme Court, they appear to be taking personal stock.

Parents appeal censorship of "XX" wristbands at girls' soccer games to same appeals court SCOTUS refused to review, which upheld ban on gender-critical shirt as "reasonably interpreted to demean" a "deeply rooted" identity.

As seven of the nine Supreme Court handed Donald Trump another defeat in his AEA mass deportation effort, Justice Samuel Alito scolded his colleagues for their decision to hear the case at all. The post ‘Here is what actually happened’: Alito slams SCOTUS colleagues over ‘misleading’ timeline in Trump Alien Enemies Act deportation case defeat first appeared on Law & Crime.

Justice Samuel Alito sharply criticized his Supreme Court colleagues for declining to take up the case of a Massachusetts middle school student who was punished for wearing a T-shirt stating "There Are Only Two Genders.

The Supreme Court on Tuesday turned down a middle-school student’s claim he had a free-speech right to wear a T-shirt stating there are “only two genders.” Ov

Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas dissented from U.S. Supreme Court's decision not to hear a free speech case involving a Massachusetts student who was punished for wearing a T-shirt indicating there are just two genders.

The Supreme Court declined Tuesday to halt a land transfer in Arizona that Western Apache people say will destroy a sacred site in order to mine for copper.

The U.S. Supreme Court declined on Tuesday to hear a student's challenge on free speech grounds to a Massachusetts public school's decision to bar him from wearing a T-shirt reading "There are only two genders" due to concern about the message's effect on transgender and other pupils.

Judge James Ho of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit responded to the Supreme Court charging a district court with “inaction” for not ruling on an emergency injunction in A.A.R.P v. Trump in 42 minutes by arguing they had over 14 hours.