The New Jersey Supreme Court held that police body-worn camera footage of an interview should not be kept confidential when it involves a person who has not been arrested or charged with a crime.

Government officials cannot refuse to disclose police body-worn camera footage to people who are the subject of the recordings, with few exceptions, the New Jersey Supreme Court unanimously ruled ...

Nearly half of smaller police departments equip officers with body worn cameras. Here's why the Shasta County Sheriff's ...

ESSEX COUNTY, N.J.-- Even though President Trump's executive order to freeze federal grants has been paused by two judges, ...

Reports show that 2024 was only the second time in the past 15 years that fewer than 100 complaints were filed by citizens ...

Ensuring that body cameras are being used is an important ... even if they are moved to a different building.” New Jersey law does not provide civilian complaint review boards with investigative ...

NJ Advance Media is withholding the names of the parents to avoid identifying their child, an alleged victim of sexual abuse. The interview was recorded on a police body worn camera. When the ...

Eight states mandate the statewide use of body-worn cameras by law enforcement officers: Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Maryland, New Jersey, New Mexico and South Carolina, according a ...