The U.S. and NATO are working on a novel approach to supply Ukraine with weapons using funds from NATO countries to pay for ...

NATO must prioritize the reform of its command and control systems to ensure its members are effective and compatible with ...

Under the leadership of “Redis,” one of Ukraine’s most legendary commanders, the Azov Battalion has grown into a full-fledged ...

NATO is deploying F-35s over Poland to deter Russian threats near Ukraine's border. The mission is the first F-35 operation there under NATO command.

NATO members that border Russia are buying US-made HIMARS. One defense minister told BI that the war shows deep strike abilities are needed.

The NATO summit in The Hague reaffirmed the alliance’s commitment to Ukraine’s Euro-Atlantic future, and President Zelensky’s meeting with President Trump highlighted the need for… ...

Ignoring the threat posed by North Korea, as happened at this year’s summit, undermines Euro-Atlantic security.

Beneath the 5 percent defense spending pledge lies NATO’s most significant strategic pivot since the end of the Cold War: an ambitious overhaul of its air and missile defense architecture.

President Trump's shift from NATO critic to supporter coincides with alliance nations doubling defense spending targets from 2% to 5% of GDP, following years of contentious relations.

Trump advocates for NATO allies to increase defense spending amid growing global threats.

The NATO summit of 2025 occurred in a context where the U.S. has backtracked on support for Ukraine, and Japan faced a dilemma over how to respond to its ally’s actions in Iran.

The conventional wisdom seems to be that Donald Trump got what he wanted out of NATO. But what if it's NATO that got what it wanted out of him?