“The majority declares that it knows better than the District Court what happened in a South Carolina map-drawing room to produce District 1. But the proof is in the pudding: On page after ...

In arguments before the Supreme Court in October, attorneys for South Carolina argued that state lawmakers had not relied on race to draw maps in violation of the Constitution. Rather, they used ...

It’s been one year since the U.S. Supreme Court threw out an argument that South Carolina’s First Congressional District was ...

These maps, their complaint said ... Dig deeper: Why is it so hard for South Carolina to draw competitive voting districts? Last year, during redistricting hearings, committees emphasized that ...

the court battle involving the single district in South Carolina centers around claims that race was improperly used during the map-drawing process in violation of the Constitution's Equal ...

There was also evidence that South Carolina’s mapmakers had to rely on racial data to draw a Republican gerrymander ... have to produce “alternative maps” that achieve the state legislature ...

The majority declares that it knows better than the District Court what happened in a South Carolina map-drawing room to produce District 1…. In the majority’s version, all the deference that ...

COLUMBIA, S.C. -- Federal judges ordered South Carolina lawmakers to draw new congressional maps, ruling Friday that the U.S. House district lines of a seat flipped by Democrats four years ago ...

The Supreme Court reversed a lower court ruling that found South Carolina Republican state legislators discriminated against Black voters when drawing recent congressional maps. The lower court ...