A Wood County man convicted of raping his wife lost his argument before the Ohio Supreme Court. The court sided with ...

All eyes are on the Supreme Court as it issues this term’s final flurry of opinions — some of which concern hot-button issues ...

Future access to gender-affirming care for transgender youth is in the hands of the Supreme Court — and the stakes couldn't ...

The Supreme Court on Friday evening released orders from the justices’ private conference on Thursday. The justices added ...

Jim Obergefell never planned to sue the state of Ohio, but his love for his husband drove him to become a pioneer for LGBTQ+ ...

The Supreme Court unanimously rejected the "background circumstances" rule, which held major-group employees to a higher ...

The U.S. Supreme Court sided with an Ohio woman who claimed to be the victim of reverse discrimination because she is ...

Yesterday's unanimous Supreme Court decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services is primarily notable for the ruling ...

The justices stated that under federal law, there is no distinction between “discrimination” and “reverse discrimination.” It’s all illegal and subject to the same standards.

I am not suggesting that discrimination cannot go the other way. It is conceivable that a minority group can discriminate ...