The King and Queen unveiled the artwork by Peter Kuhfeld and Paul S. Benney during a visit to The National Gallery in London ...

Alongside the Queen in her portrait is her crown and the Robe of Estate she wore as she left Westminster Abbey on coronation day. The King sat for Mr Kuhfeld at St James's Palace five times over a ...

It, too, is part of the Royal Collection, and currently hangs in Windsor Castle—which is also home to Queen Elizabeth II’s coronation portrait, which was painted by Sir Herbert James Gunn in 1953.

Are these brand-new paintings as polarizing as the first official portrait of the king? Scroll down and judge for yourself!

Some royal fans believe there is a risque detail in the new portrait of King Charles unveiled at the National Gallery.

which is set against the backdrop of the Throne Room at St. James’s Palace. The portrait features the Imperial State Crown resting on a table to the king’s left. The monarch is depicted ...

Others said that the portrait, by Jonathan Yeo, made the king appear to be burning in hell ... Queen Elizabeth II’s, by Herbert James Gunn, showed her in the Throne Room at Buckingham Palace, the ...

The king and queen commissioned the paintings ... The earliest example in the royal collection is the state portrait of James I of England, James VI of Scotland, from 1620.

Two years after their Coronation at Westminster Abbey, The King and Queen unveiled their Coronation State portraits at the National Gallery. The two portraits are on display from 6 May to 5 June in ...

1620 likeness of James VI & I; another image by Van Dyck, at Windsor Castle, was likely conceived as Charles I’s official state portrait. Since the coronation of King Edward VII, in 1902 ...

Others said that the portrait, by Jonathan Yeo, made the king appear to be burning in hell ... Queen Elizabeth II’s, by Herbert James Gunn, showed her in the Throne Room at Buckingham Palace ...